Validity and test-retest reliability of the brief balance evaluation systems test in typically developing children aged 7 to 10 years

Authors

  • Weerapong Tepkaew, MSc, PT Human movement performance enhancement research unit, Department of physical therapy, Faculty of allied health sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Duangporn Suriyaamarit, PhD, PT Human movement performance enhancement research unit, Department of physical therapy, Faculty of allied health sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1532-4879

Keywords:

postural control, Brief-BESTest, reliability, validity, typically developing children

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BESTest) in typically developing children aged 7–10 years, a critical period for postural control development. We hypothesized that the Brief-BESTest would show excellent test-retest reliability and moderate to good concurrent validity compared to laboratory-based balance assessments.

Materials and Methods: An observational study included 26 typically developing children aged 7 to 10 years and 11 months. Participants completed the Brief-BESTest, the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB), and the unilateral stance test. Validity was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient to compare Brief-BESTest scores with sway velocity data from force plate assessments. Test-retest reliability was determined by administering the Brief-BESTest twice, eight days apart, using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The Brief-BESTest showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC (3,1) = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.80–0.96, p < 0.001). The SEM and MDC were 0.78 and 1.25, respectively. Concurrent validity showed moderate correlations with the Foam-eye open condition of the mCTSIB (r = 0.50, p = 0.01) and unilateral stance tests (Left- eye open: r = 0.48, p = 0.01; Right- eye open: r = 0.52, p = 0.01).

Conclusion: The Brief-BESTest is a reliable and valid tool for assessing postural control in children. These findings highlight the potential of the Brief-BESTest as a practical balance assessment tool in pediatric clinical settings. However, further studies with diverse age groups are recommended to strengthen the generalizability of these results.

References

Sahli S, Ghroubi S, Rebai H, Chaâbane M, Yahia A, Pérennou D, Elleuch MH. The effect of circus activity training on postural control of 5–6-year-old children. Science & Sports. 2013;28(1):11-6.

Sobera M, Siedlecka B, Syczewska M. Posture control development in children aged 2-7 years old, based on the changes of repeatability of the stability indices. Neurosci Lett. 2011;491(1):13-7.

Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. The growth of stability: postural control from a development perspective. J Mot Behav. 1985;17(2):131-47.

Cumberworth VL, Patel NN, Rogers W, Kenyon GS. The maturation of balance in children. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121(5):449-54.

Sundermier L, Woollacott M, Roncesvalles N, Jensen J. The development of balance control in children: comparisons of EMG and kinetic variables and chronological and developmental groupings. Exp Brain Res. 2001;136(3):340-50.

Shumway-Cook A WM. Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice. 2017.

Sá CDSCd, Boffino CC, Ramos RT, Tanaka C. Development of postural control and maturation of sensory systems in children of different ages a cross-sectional study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2018;22(1):70-6.

Ludwig O, Kelm J, Hammes A, Schmitt E, Fröhlich M. Neuromuscular performance of balance and posture control in childhood and adolescence. Heliyon. 2020;6(7):e04541.

Mani H, Miyagishima S, Kozuka N, Kodama Y, Takeda K, Asaka T. Development of postural control during single-leg standing in children aged 3-10 years. Gait Posture. 2019;68:174-80.

Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait & Posture. 1995;3(4):193-214.

Dewar R, Claus AP, Tucker K, Ware RS, Johnston LM. Reproducibility of the Kids-BESTest and the Kids-Mini-BESTest for children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(4):695-702.

Dewar R, Claus AP, Tucker K, Ware R, Johnston LM. Reproducibility of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and the Mini-BESTest in school-aged children. Gait Posture. 2017;55:68-74.

Palluel E, Ceyte H, Olivier I, Nougier V. Anticipatory postural adjustments associated with a forward leg raising in children: effects of age, segmental acceleration and sensory context. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(11):2546-54.

Horak FB, Wrisley DM, Frank J. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther. 2009;89(5):484-98.

Horak FB. Postural Control. In: Binder MD, Hirokawa N, Windhorst U, editors. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009. p. 3212-9.

Padgett PK, Jacobs JV, Kasser SL. Is the BESTest at its best? A suggested brief version based on interrater reliability, validity, internal consistency, and theoretical construct. Phys Ther. 2012;92(9):1197-207.

Lo CWT, Lin C-Y, Tsang WWN, Yan CH, Wong AYL. Psychometric properties of Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test among multiple populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(1):155-75.e2.

Godi M, Giardini M, Arcolin I, Ferrante S, Nardone A, Corna S, Colombo R. Is the Brief-BESTest Brief enough? Suggested modifications based on structural validity and internal consistency. Phys Ther. 2019;99(11):1562-73.

Rodrigues LC, Marques AP, Barros PB, Michaelsen SM. Reliability of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and BESTest sections for adults with hemiparesis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(3):276-81.

Kumban W, Nakkeaw C, Patite A, Sukkeawnarong K, Soonthoanon K. Reliability and Validity of The Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BEStest) in children with cerebral palsy. Thai Journal of Physical Therapy. 2020;42(1):1-11.

Pennell A, Fisher J, Patey M, Miedema ST, Stodden D, Lieberman L, et al. Measurement properties of Brief-BESTest scores from children, adolescents, and youth with visual impairments. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(20):4797-806.

Kyaw ZM, Suriyaamarit D, Taweetanalarp S. Test-Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of The Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BESTest) in typical children aged five to seven years old. Journal of Health Science and Alternative Medicine. 2024;6(02):85-90.

Leslie G. Portney D, PhD, FAPTA, Dean Emerita, Professions MIoH, Science SoHaR, Boston M. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 4th, editor. United States of America: F. A. Davis Company; 2009.

Starkes J, Riach C, Clarke B. Chapter 15 The Effect of Eye Closure on Postural Sway: Converging Evidence from children and a parkinson patient. In: Proteau L, Elliott D, editors. Advances in Psychology. 85: North-Holland; 1992. p. 353-73.

Huang M, Pang MYC. Psychometric properties of Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BESTest) in evaluating balance performance in individuals with chronic stroke. Brain Behav. 2017;7(3):e00649.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-12

How to Cite

1.
Tepkaew W, Suriyaamarit D. Validity and test-retest reliability of the brief balance evaluation systems test in typically developing children aged 7 to 10 years. Int. Phys. Ther. Res. Symp. 11th [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 12 [cited 2025 Jul. 11];11(1):172-83. Available from: https://conference.in.th/index.php/IPTRS2025/article/view/Tepkaew_Suriyaamarit.2025